<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inspired? No &#187; crm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inspired.no/category/crm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inspired.no</link>
	<description>Espen Antonsen writes about the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CRM On-Demand Is In Demand</title>
		<link>http://blog.inspired.no/crm-on-demand-is-in-demand-174</link>
		<comments>http://blog.inspired.no/crm-on-demand-is-in-demand-174#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Espen Antonsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspired.goodcheapsleep.com/crm-on-demand-is-in-demand-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CRM Blog has a nice post about why on-demand CRM popularity is increasing. Sidney C. Lejfer lists up the following main points: Replacement of large Software Purchase with a monthly subscription charge   Flexible Pricing, Licensing, and Scalability   Decrease in Hardware Requirements and Support   Decrease in IT Support Staff   Elimination of Costly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://crm.blogs.com">CRM Blog</a> has a nice <a href="http://crm.blogs.com/crm/2006/02/crm_ondemand_is.html">post about why on-demand CRM popularity is increasing</a>. Sidney C. Lejfer lists up the following main points:</p>
<ul>
<li>Replacement of large Software Purchase with a monthly subscription charge</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Flexible Pricing, Licensing, and Scalability</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Decrease in Hardware Requirements and Support</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Decrease in IT Support Staff</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Elimination of Costly Upgrade Charges</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Remote Management</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Faster and Easier Deployment</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Good Solution for Distributed Offices</li>
<p> </p>
<li>General ease of use</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Availability of Good Mobile Solutions</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Security and Backup Services</li>
<p> </p>
<li>On-line Training</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Significant Third Party Add-ons and Web Services</li>
<p> </p>
<li>Integration Capabilities</li>
<p> </ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.inspired.no/crm-on-demand-is-in-demand-174/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of the beginning: SaaS starts walking upright</title>
		<link>http://blog.inspired.no/the-end-of-the-beginning-saas-starts-walking-upright-164</link>
		<comments>http://blog.inspired.no/the-end-of-the-beginning-saas-starts-walking-upright-164#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Espen Antonsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspired.goodcheapsleep.com/the-end-of-the-beginning-saas-starts-walking-upright-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article about Software As a Service (SaaS) by by Cliff Reeves (Microsoft Emerging Business Team): The end of the beginning: SaaS starts walking upright. Don&#8217;t you just love it when another hype cycle settles down? Is SaaS evolving from pure web-based access to client-server? Is it evolving from purely hosted environments to include enterprise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article about Software As a Service (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SaaS">SaaS</a>) by by <a href="http://cliffreeves.typepad.com/">Cliff Reeves (Microsoft Emerging Business Team)</a>:<br />
<a href="http://cliffreeves.typepad.com/dyermaker/2005/09/saas_and_walkin.html">The end of the beginning: SaaS starts walking upright</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t you just love it when another hype cycle settles down? Is SaaS evolving from pure web-based access to client-server? Is it evolving from purely hosted environments to include enterprise server deployments? Will we finally stop hearing:</p>
<p>* &#8220;we are implementing everything on the web with thin clients. No desktop deployments!&#8221;<br />
* &#8220;It&#8217;s all On Demand, baby, no servers required!&#8221;</p>
<p>It appears so, and the evolution appears inevitable, driven by three forces:</p>
<p>1. Revenue, because users matter, and browser access penalizes power users<br />
2. Lower training costs and higher adoption rates when using familar tools<br />
3. Legacy Integration and customization</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting post. I don&#8217;t fully agree with everything though. But mainly because of a different focus. <a href="http://www.24SevenOffice.com">24SevenOffice</a> do not focus on the enterprise market.</p>
<p>Cliff says that SaaS providers <a href="http://www.salesforce.com">Salesforce.com</a> and <a href="http://www.crmondemand.com">Siebel</a> offers client software in addition to the web access. We have 24SevenSync which is a plug-in for <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> Outlook which lets users synchronize data between 24SevenOffice and Outlook.</p>
<p>He states that browsers don&#8217;t offer the same user experience as local software. Im not going discuss further on that but I would like say that we have solved a lot issues with user interface and speed. <a href="/2005/01/web-applications-in-2005-case-study.html">See my article</a> about our CRM module. We use the Ajax technique extensively.</p>
<p>I agree with his point on using familiar tools. That is why we have designed 24SevenOffice to appear as a Windows application and not as a normal webpage.</p>
<p>Technorati: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/crm">CRM</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/SaaS">SaaS</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Ajax">Ajax</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/24SevenOffice">24SevenOffice</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Salesforce.com">Salesforce.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.inspired.no/the-end-of-the-beginning-saas-starts-walking-upright-164/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle buys PeopleSoft</title>
		<link>http://blog.inspired.no/oracle-buys-peoplesoft-95</link>
		<comments>http://blog.inspired.no/oracle-buys-peoplesoft-95#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Espen Antonsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspired.goodcheapsleep.com/oracle-buys-peoplesoft-95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well after a long battle Oracle has finally taken over PeopleSoft. Will be interesting to see how this turns out. I must say I am very negative to mergers and corporate acqusistions of this size. The HP/Compaq merger is good example of how hard it is to combine two different corporate cultures, strategies and to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well after a long battle Oracle has finally taken over PeopleSoft. Will be interesting to see how this turns out. I must say I am very negative to mergers and corporate acqusistions of this size. The HP/Compaq merger is good example of how hard it is to combine two different corporate cultures, strategies and to achieve synergies and cost-cuttings from this. A motive can off course be &#8216;if you can&#8217;t beat them &#8211; buy them&#8217;. Bad for competition, customers and the remaining competitors.</p>
<p>Acquisitions of this type in the ERP/CRM market is by no means a surprise. It has been happening for a while (i.e. Microsoft overtake of Navision) and is very much expected to continune, in fact it&#8217;s required with the large number of players in the market and many of them with very poor financial results.</p>
<blockquote><p>PeopleSoft, Inc. (Nasdaq: PSFT) today announced that following discussions throughout the weekend, the Board of Directors, based upon the recommendation of the Transaction Committee of independent directors, has approved a definitive merger agreement under which a subsidiary of Oracle Corporation (Nasdaq: ORCL) will acquire all PeopleSoft shares for $26.50 per share in cash. The total value of the transaction is approximately $10.3 billion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peoplesoft.com/corp/en/news_events/news/database/press_release.jsp?doc=35F17B9A9106944F88256F69003B102C">PeopleSoft | PEOPLESOFT AGREES TODEFINITIVE MERGER AGREEMENT</a> and <a href="http://news.com.com/Oracle buys PeopleSoft for 10 billion/2100-7343_3-5488298.html">Oracle buys PeopleSoft for $10 billion | CNET News.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.inspired.no/oracle-buys-peoplesoft-95/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
